State v. Werring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing because although counsel were informed of a jury note, they were not allowed to see the note or to make a record of the incident before the judge answered the questions
• counsel were informed of the jury note’s contents but were not allowed to see the note or to make a record of the incident. The judge went into the jury room and answered the questions in the note and others posed by the jurors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).