State v. Wendorf
Syllabus
criminal contempt failure to appear can constitute interference with a court's lawful process and serve as basis for criminal contempt jurisdiction to review plenary proceedings for criminal contempt appealed from district court to superior court nature of de novo review of plenary proceedings of criminal contempt in superior court notice required for plenary proceedings for criminal contempt and validity of show cause order to provide notice erroneous failure to apply beyond a reasonable doubt standard of proof in plenary proceeding for criminal contempt in district court was not a jurisdictional defect testimony by judicial official who presided over prior proceeding was permissible in subsequent proceeding before different judicial official on appeal from prior proceeding
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Galyon v. StuttsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1954-11-24· cited 25×
- Stancill v. StancillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-06-16· cited 14×
- State v. SalterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-04-02· cited 11×
- State v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-04-17· cited 10×
- Kearney v. BollingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-07-07· cited 10×
- State v. RevelsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-12-06· cited 6×
- State v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-01-16· cited 5×
- Albright v. . AlbrightSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1872-06-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.