State v. Welch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s finding, based on a witness’s testimony, that the initial conversation between the witness and the defendant contained a “sexual overtone” was supported by the evidence
• concluding, when “[n]o removal—let alone nonincidental removal—[wa]s even alleged,” that “facts clearly d[id] not support a conviction for kidnapping”
• victim of alleged kidnapping also victim of attempted second-degree criminal sexual conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Swanson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 131×
• Gulbertson v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-03-05· cited 43×
• State v. Sanchez-Diaz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-29· cited 34×
• State v. Crow
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-04-19· cited 18×
• Turnage v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-26· cited 16×
• State v. Juarez
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-10-02· cited 9×
• State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Nicholas Lee Hill, Respondent
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-07-23

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• State v. Spreigl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
• State v. Morris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-08-02· cited 43×
• State v. Crocker
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-07-24· cited 41×
• State v. Grossman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-12-13· cited 39×
• State v. Huss
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-10-01· cited 36×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-09-25· cited 32×
• State v. Zupetz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-13· cited 30×
• State v. Raymond
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 19×
• State v. Grossman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-04-17· cited 11×