State v. Weidul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for a mistrial based on testimony by the defendant’s father that the defendant “already served 29 months” when the defendant declined the court’s offer to instruct the jury to disregard the testimony
• concluding that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for a mistrial based on testimony by the defendant's father that the defendant \already served 29 months\ when the defendant declined the court's offer to instruct the jury to disregard the testimony
• no remedial measure after disclosure of prior incarceration when the defendant twice declined the offer of a curative instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Asch v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2003-02-06· cited 56×
• State v. Cochran
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-05-05· cited 18×
• State v. Krieger
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-08-19· cited 11×
• State of Maine v. Matthew W. Pendleton
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2025-05-01· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Libby
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-10-15· cited 23×
• State v. Weidul
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-07-13· cited 11×
• State v. Bedrin
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-12-14· cited 5×