State v. Weems

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that search was unlawful where officer safety concerns had dissipated because patdown after the defendant was handcuffed did not raise any further concern that the defendant posed a threat
• officer’s removal of items from defendant’s pocket after patdown search was not justified by officer-safety concerns where “there was no evidence that defendant posed an immediate threat of injury to the officers present”
• officer’s removal of items from defendant’s pocket after patdown search was not justified by officer-safety concerns where “there was no evidence that defendant posed an immediate threat of injury to the officers present”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. Putnam County Board of Education
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 15×
• State v. Musalf
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-03· cited 8×
• State v. Rudder
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-23· cited 5×
• State v. Davenport
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-12· cited 4×
• State v. Stanley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Bates
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
• State v. Hoskinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 48×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 21×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 11×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-17· cited 9×
• State v. Clew
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-04-24· cited 6×