State v. Weekly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Foucha based on the differences between conditional and unconditional release such that the State could require an insanity acquittee seeking unconditional release to show both that he “(1) has no mental disease, and (2
• all noting that defendant was acquitted by reason of mental disease or defect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2008-08-26· cited 36×
• Revels v. Sanders
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-03-10· cited 25×
• Grass v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-02-27· cited 11×
• State v. Gratts
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-04-29· cited 7×
• In re: Matthew J. King v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-01-29· cited 5×
• Grass v. Reitz
  E.D. Missouri· 2010-03-29· cited 3×
• State v. Larrington
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-04-14· cited 2×
• State v. D.W.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-09-04· cited 1×
• Frederick Revels v. Mary Sanders
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-03-10
• State of Missouri v. William G. Carter a/k/a Billy Carter
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-09-29

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Carron
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1976-05-05· cited 7,357×
• Foucha v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 1,348×
• Jones v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 741×
• State v. Revels
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2000-03-21· cited 22×
• State v. Nash
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-05-05· cited 11×
• State v. Dudley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-07-05· cited 9×
• Jensen v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-07-30· cited 6×