State v. Webster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court was obligated to seal juvenile’s records once statutory requirements were met, even if juvenile was convicted of a sex offense
• holding trial court was obligated to seal juvenile’s records once statutory requirements were met, even if juvenile was convicted of a sex offense
• holding trial court was obligated to seal juvenile's records once statutory requirements were met, even ifjuvenile was convicted ofa sex offense
• holding trial court was required to grant motion in light of “shall” mandate
• holding trial court was required to grant motion in light of \shall\ mandate
• Interpreting RCW 13.50.050(11) as establishing a mandatory duty to order vacation and sealing if two years had passed since discharge from agency supervision and there were no later convictions.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. TK
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-07-01· cited 75×
• State v. T.K.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-10-14· cited 73×
• State v. S.J.C.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2015-06-11· cited 46×
• State v. T.K.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-08· cited 13×
• State v. J.C.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-01-05· cited 6×
• State v. TK
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-04
• State of Washington v. Jacob L. Cunningham
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-01-05

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morris v. Blaker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-01-02· cited 130×
• State v. Stannard
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-09-24· cited 89×
• Clark v. Pacificorp
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 77×