· 12/5/1989
State v. Weber-Connelly, Naegele, Inc.
Citations
- 448 N.W.2d 380
- 1989 Minn. App. LEXIS 1273
- 1989 WL 145476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a state statute permits compensation for lost rental income, and that the income approach for appraising billboards is proper because the property was income producing and the billboards could not be relocated
- statute must be interpreted consistently with the common law of eminent domain
- location factor, where property itself generates-income, billboard cannot be relocated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schumacher, Gardebring, Leslie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.