Skip to main content
· 12/5/1989

State v. Weber-Connelly, Naegele, Inc.

Citations

  • 448 N.W.2d 380
  • 1989 Minn. App. LEXIS 1273
  • 1989 WL 145476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a state statute permits compensation for lost rental income, and that the income approach for appraising billboards is proper because the property was income producing and the billboards could not be relocated
  • statute must be interpreted consistently with the common law of eminent domain
  • location factor, where property itself generates-income, billboard cannot be relocated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schumacher, Gardebring, Leslie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.