State v. Weber
Citations
- 2025 ND 183
Syllabus
A party bears the burden to correctly label its motion as to inform the court of the relief sought. The district court did not err when it treated appellant's motion as a request for relief under N.D.R.Crim.P. 35(a) based on its label. An as-applied challenge to probation conditions is not ripe for review when the individual subject to the probation conditions is still incarcerated. This Court declines to address a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute without the benefit of adversarial briefing.
Judges: Bahr, Douglas Alan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court· 2020-05-07· cited 297×
- N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-06-29· cited 36×
- State v. YostNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-11-12· cited 18×
- State v. RunckNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-12-29· cited 15×
- Overbo, et al. v. OverboNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-12-19· cited 10×
- State v. McClaryNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-02-18· cited 8×
- State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-07-21· cited 8×
- State v. EaglemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-12-19· cited 4×
- State v. DunnNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-02-16· cited 3×
- Garaas, et al. v. Continental Resources, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-08-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.