Skip to main content
· 10/1/1985

State v. Waukazo

Citations

  • 374 N.W.2d 563
  • 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the district court acted within its discretion in admitting relationship evidence to “illuminate” the relationship and place crime in the “proper context”
  • determining court acted within its discretion in 5 admitting relationship evidence to “illuminate” the relationship and place the charged assault in the “proper context”
  • discussing with approval the admission of relevant evidence “to illuminate [the] relationship [between defendant and victim] and place the incident with which [defendant] was charged in proper context”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Sedgwick, Lansing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.