State v. Watts
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 635
Syllabus
MOTION TO SUPPRESS – OVI SUSPENSION: In a prosecution for driving under an OVI suspension, the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress on the ground that defendant failed to satisfy the initial burden to demonstrate that the state conducted a warrantless seizure: defendant's motion to suppress argued that defendant had been driving a vehicle registered to defendant's daughter, the officer did not cite defendant with any other violations, and the officer testified at the motion-to-suppress hearing, but could not recall the reason for initiating the traffic stop.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 509×
- State v. ShindlerOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-10· cited 223×
- State v. CodeluppiOhio Supreme Court· 2014-04-17· cited 110×
- State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-09· cited 14×
- State v. NewellOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.