Skip to main content

State v. Watts

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3282

Syllabus

Complicity R.C. 2903.02 aiding and abetting aggravated murder R.C. 2903.01(B) murder R.C. 2903.02(A) and (B) aggravated burglary R.C. 2911.11(A)(1) felonious assault R.C. 2903.11(A)(1) kidnapping R.C. 2905.01(A)(3) sufficiency and manifest weight of the evidence allied offenses effective assistance of counsel. Defendant's convictions were affirmed because the state presented sufficient circumstantial evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was complicit in the crimes against the victim and the trier of fact did not clearly lose its weight when it found defendant guilty. Thus, defendant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Further, there was no error when the trial court did not merge defendant's aggravated murder and kidnapping convictions because the evidence showed that the restraint of the victim was prolonged such that there was a separate animus for kidnapping and aggravated murder and thus, counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the trial court's merger analysis.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.