State v. Watts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court may “limit or exclude the use of impeachment evidence whose prejudicial effect far out-distances its value to the jury as an aid for determining credibility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wise
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1994-08-15· cited 179×
• State v. McClanahan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-08-26· cited 15×
• Scroggins v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-06-01· cited 12×
• State v. Kinder
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-08-09· cited 12×
• State v. Francis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-06-22· cited 9×
• State v. Moore
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-05-20· cited 7×
• State v. Williams
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-07-31· cited 7×
• State v. Franklin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-03-07· cited 6×
• State v. McCracken
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-06-30· cited 5×
• State v. Fry
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-07-24· cited 4×
• State v. Nyhuis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-09-26· cited 4×
• State v. Phillips
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-02-04· cited 3×
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROMMEL R. NEWTON
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-08-04· cited 1×
• State of Missouri v. Shaamar R. Steele
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-04-16· cited 1×
• State v. Thompson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-06-29· cited 1×
• State of Missouri v. Travon Dornay Johnson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-06-23