State v. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State took sufficient steps to avoid a violation of defendant's right by electing to submit a particular act to support the charge
• no unanimity concern when victim’s testimony did not establish multiple acts of digital penetration and defendant admitted to only one such act
• the State took sufficient steps to avoid violating defendant’s right to a unanimous jury verdict by electing to submit a particular act to support the charge of statutory sodomy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• STATE OF MISSOURI v. WADE A. STUCKLEY
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-05-13· cited 18×
• State v. Adams
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-12-04· cited 16×
• State v. Carlton
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-09-05· cited 10×
• State of Missouri v. Carlton James Dickerson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-07-21
• Christopher Sanders v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-06-14

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Celis-Garcia
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-06-14· cited 149×
• State v. Holland
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1983-06-30· cited 51×
• State v. Dorsey
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2010-07-16· cited 41×
• State v. Edwards
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-03-13· cited 21×
• City of Lee's Summit v. Collins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-03-30· cited 9×
• Bruce v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-06-22· cited 8×