State v. Waters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Each of subsections 1-5, on the other hand, is connected by ‘and,’ and, therefore, each must be satisfied.”
• where a movant does not allege facts to satisfy the elements required by Missouri post-conviction DNA testing, it is not necessary to remand for findings of fact and conclusions of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mercer v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2017-03-14· cited 8×
• State of Missouri v. Ardell Fields
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-07-19· cited 5×
• RICHARD SCOTT MERCER, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-12-29
• David L. Ross v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2023-01-17
• Timothy Davis v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2023-06-20

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weeks v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-08-03· cited 86×
• Crews v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-11-30· cited 37×
• Clayton v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-05-17· cited 5×
• State v. Waters
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-05-18· cited 4×