Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 11/18/2008
State v. Washington
Citations
- 668 S.E.2d 622
- 193 N.C. App. 670
- 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 2019
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding conclusion \that the officer had a right to make a brief investigatory stop of defendant because he was transporting [a person wanted for various felony offenses] was erroneous as a matter of law\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2008-11-18· cited 14×
- State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-09-05· cited 9×
- State v. BedientCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-05-03· cited 7×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-12-06· cited 7×
- State v. HolleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-09-03
- State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-07-07
- State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-09-20
- State v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-12-31
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- In re J.L.B.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2006-03-21· cited 36×
- State v. DammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2003-11-06· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.