State v. Wash
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 152
Syllabus
The trial court properly overruled appellant's motion to suppress where the traffic stop was valid given the trooper's observation of appellant committing traffic violations. A canine sniff indicated the presence of narcotics, so that troopers had probable cause to search the car for drugs. Appellant was not denied effective assistance of counsel where his counsel did not challenge the canine's training or reliability where there is no indication in the record that any such challenge would have resulted in the trial court granting appellant's motion to suppress.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 619×
- City of Bowling Green v. GodwinOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 120×
- State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-28· cited 68×
- State v. CaseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 35×
- State v. LynnOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.