Indiana Court of Appeals· 2/2/1892
State v. Warwick
Citations
- 3 Ind. App. 508
- 29 N.E. 1142
- 1892 Ind. App. LEXIS 42
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating a strict adherence to the statutory language in that where statute did not allow for forfeiture to be set aside, sureties’ only option was a motion per Rule 60
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1884-10-09· cited 18×
- Patterson v. State ex rel. NeffIndiana Supreme Court· 1859-05-25· cited 14×
- Gachenheimer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1867-05-15· cited 13×
- Weese v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1858-04-15· cited 5×
- State v. ShidelerIndiana Supreme Court· 1875-11-15· cited 5×
- State v. SoudrietteIndiana Supreme Court· 1886-02-10· cited 5×
- State v. InmanIndiana Supreme Court· 1844-07-24· cited 4×
- State ex rel. Lewis v. SpeckIndiana Supreme Court· 1863-05-15· cited 4×
- Woolfolk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1858-06-24· cited 3×
- State v. RoweIndiana Supreme Court· 1885-09-22· cited 3×
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1846-06-02· cited 2×
- McGuire v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1854-05-23· cited 2×
- Stegars v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1827-11-17· cited 1×
- Lorance v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1849-05-31· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.