Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/12/2013

State v. Warren

Citations

297 Kan. 881
304 P.3d 1288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the district court's imposition of a presumptive sentence can be reviewed on appeal if record shows the district court did not understand its statutory authority to grant probation
holding that when a defendant who receives a presumptive sentence claims the district court misinterpreted its own statutory authority, the appellate court may take up the limited question of whether the district court properly interpreted the sentencing statute
Court of Appeals had jurisdiction, despite sentence within presumptive range, to review claim that district court erroneously believed it did not possess authority to impose downward departure
appellate court may consider limited question whether district court properly interpreted sentencing statute
court has jurisdiction to hear appeal from a presumptive sentence when the district court misunderstood its statutory authority to grant a departure sentence when defendant possessed only a small amount of marijuana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.