Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/11/1976
State v. Warren
Citations
- 557 P.2d 1248
- 221 Kan. 10
- 1976 Kan. LEXIS 547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that to prove intent to permanently deprive, the State merely needs to present evidence that the defendant did not intend to restore the property to the rightful owner
- when the defendant left the stolen vehicle in another town and never informed the owner of its whereabouts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaul
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KeelerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-12-06· cited 52×
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-02-05· cited 29×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-05-30· cited 22×
- State v. McGheeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-12-01· cited 22×
- State v. GrauerholzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-12-03· cited 15×
- State v. LilleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-07-16· cited 14×
- State v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1980-02-29· cited 6×
- State v. ChristonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-06-01· cited 6×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-06-15· cited 104×
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-03-01· cited 87×
- State v. RitsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-12-07· cited 51×
- State v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-07-23· cited 32×
- State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-03-29· cited 28×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-07-17· cited 26×
- State v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-01-09· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.