State v. Warner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming adoption of English common-law offense of libel because speech “was sufficiently scur- rilous, abusive and indecent, and calculated to stir up and provoke contention and strife, and so far to disturb the peace”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Milosovich
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1918-10-15· cited 21×
• State ex rel. Thompson v. Reichman
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1916-04-15· cited 13×
• State v. Hawkins
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-09-05· cited 8×
• United States v. Strong
  W.D. Washington· 1920-01-13· cited 8×
• United States v. Ault
  W.D. Washington· 1920-01-15· cited 7×
• People ex rel. Conley v. Frank
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1935-06-15· cited 4×
• State v. Vernale
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1966-02-18· cited 1×