State v. Ward

Citations

• 107 Kan. 498
• 192 P. 836
• 1920 Kan. LEXIS 106

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Robbery — Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial evidence considered, and held sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that the defendant counseled, aided and abetted commission of the crime of robbery.</p> <p>2. Same — Certain Evidence Properly Admitted. Various portions of the evidence considered, and held they were properly admitted.</p> <p>3. Same — Instruction as to Circumstantial Evidence. The certainty required in order to warrant conviction on circumstantial evidence considered, and held, an instruction employing a mode of expressing such certainty different from that appearing in the case of Carl Horne v. The State of Kansas, 1 Kan. 42, was unobjectionable.</p> <p>4. Same — No Meritorious Assignments of Error. Minor assignments of error considered, and held to be without substantial merit.</p>