State v. Ward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the taking is by a state or municipal corporation, benefits may be setoff from the value of the property taken and damages
• holding that when the taking is by a state or municipal corporation, benefits may be set off from the value of the property taken and damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Thelberg
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-04-06· cited 95×
• State v. Calkins
  Washington Supreme Court· 1957-08-15· cited 62×
• Anhoco Corporation v. Dade County
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1962-03-07· cited 39×
• State v. Sherrill
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-04-21· cited 26×
• State v. Fox
  Washington Supreme Court· 1958-12-04· cited 26×
• Balog v. State, Department of Roads
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1964-11-20· cited 26×
• Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle v. Kenmore Properties, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-02-03· cited 22×
• Keene Valley Ventures, Inc. v. City of Richland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-03-28· cited 10×
• Feuerborn v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 1961-12-07· cited 7×
• State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Brockfeld
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1964-04-21· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sultan Water & Power Co. v. Weyerhauser Timber Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1903-04-10· cited 21×
• Idaho & Western Railway Co. v. Coey
  Washington Supreme Court· 1913-04-28· cited 18×
• Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1914-03-09· cited 8×
• State ex rel. McPherson Bros. v. Superior Court
  Washington Supreme Court· 1919-08-05· cited 4×