Missouri Court of Appeals· 4/23/1991
State v. Ward
Citations
- 807 S.W.2d 225
- 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 565
- 1991 WL 60560
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the prosecutor – who referred to defense counsel’s focus on minor inconsistencies in the evidence as “trickery” – did not imply that defense counsel was personally dishonest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karohl, Pudlowski, Grimm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KreutzerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-08-20· cited 114×
- State v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-12-08· cited 37×
- State v. SteeleMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-07-13· cited 22×
- State v. O'HAVERMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-10-03· cited 18×
- State v. ReyesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-06-24· cited 12×
- State v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-01-23· cited 11×
- State v. KennedyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-03-04· cited 10×
- State v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-09-02· cited 9×
- State v. SheridanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-02-21· cited 9×
- State v. CrewsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-05-16· cited 8×
- State v. BurnettMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-08-27· cited 7×
- State v. HansonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-07-07· cited 2×
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MICHAEL EDWARD AMICKMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-06-11
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.