State v. Ward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A conviction of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (K.S.A. 8-1567) may be sustained although based solely on circumstantial evidence.”
• DUI can be established by circumstantial evidence only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vistuba
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-10-30· cited 75×
• State v. Pham
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1984-01-13· cited 72×
• State v. Armstrong
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1984-10-26· cited 13×
• State v. Gardner
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-05-02· cited 10×
• State v. Huffmier
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-10· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. White & Stewart
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-12-09· cited 60×
• State v. Henderson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1979-12-01· cited 35×
• State v. Dill
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1957-12-07· cited 27×
• State v. Parson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1979-10-27· cited 21×
• State v. Betts
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-03-02· cited 19×
• State v. Hazen
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1954-07-06· cited 17×
• State v. Fish
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1980-06-14· cited 17×
• State v. Morton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-01-15· cited 16×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-12-10· cited 15×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1957-05-11· cited 13×