Supreme Court of Louisiana· 10/17/1983
State v. Walters
Citations
- 440 So. 2d 115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the statute requires the State to prove the offender acted with a specific intent to arouse sexual desire, either of the actor or of the viewer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lemmon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ChandlerLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-09-08· cited 37×
- State v. PocheLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-03-01· cited 28×
- State v. FloresLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-02-28· cited 21×
- Pueblo v. Santos VegaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1984-11-26· cited 18×
- State v. Russland EnterprisesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1990-02-05· cited 14×
- State v. ArabieLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-05-01· cited 12×
- State v. WinstonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-12-09· cited 12×
- State v. CraigLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1999-08-18· cited 12×
- State v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-12-13· cited 11×
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1995-04-10· cited 9×
- State v. OdomLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-12-19· cited 7×
- State v. Louisiana Toy Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-02-14· cited 4×
- State v. PalermoLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-07-25· cited 4×
- State v. StrongLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-02-09· cited 4×
- State v. JacobsonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-11-20· cited 3×
- State v. KelloggLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-06-06· cited 3×
- State v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-06-29· cited 3×
- State v. YoungLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-09-26· cited 3×
- State v. JoshlinLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-11-09· cited 3×
- State v. PatoutLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2002-02-13· cited 1×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,568×
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,485×
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,283×
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 1,050×
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court· 1981-06-01· cited 962×
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court· 1973-02-20· cited 833×
- Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 523×
- Vance v. Universal Amusement Co.Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 270×
- State Ex Rel. Elaire v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-11-29· cited 236×
- Chaffraix v. ShiffSupreme Court· 1875-10-15· cited 154×
- Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. LearyS.D. New York· 1970-02-27· cited 89×
- Delta Book Distributors, Inc. v. CronvichE.D. Louisiana· 1969-09-03· cited 81×
- United States v. Gifford-Hill-American, Inc.Supreme Court· 1970-02-27· cited 79×
- United States v. George Joseph Santoni, United States of America v. John Jake Konstantine JakubikFourth Circuit· 1978-10-19· cited 74×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-05-26· cited 62×
- New York Feed Co. v. LearySupreme Court· 1970-02-27· cited 59×
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-12-15· cited 48×
- State v. EamesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-01-19· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.