Louisiana Court of Appeal· 5/29/1996
State v. Walter
Citations
- 675 So. 2d 831
- 94 La.App. 4 Cir. 2221
- 1996 La. App. LEXIS 1111
- 1996 WL 293769
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “[n]o testimony was elicited [at trial] concerning whether the tests were conclusive that the perpetrator was a non- secretor”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hlandrieu, Landrieu, Lobrano, Murray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.