Skip to main content

State v. Walter

Citations

  • 675 So. 2d 831
  • 94 La.App. 4 Cir. 2221
  • 1996 La. App. LEXIS 1111
  • 1996 WL 293769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[n]o testimony was elicited [at trial] concerning whether the tests were conclusive that the perpetrator was a non- secretor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hlandrieu, Landrieu, Lobrano, Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.