State v. Wallman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the court 20 lacked supplemental jurisdiction because the only commonality 21 between claims was the plaintiff’s employment relationship with 22 the defendant
• dismissing the defendant’s 17 counterclaim alleging that plaintiff engaged in self-dealing while employed with the 18 defendant, concluding that the counterclaim was insufficiently related to the plaintiff’s 19 FLSA claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).