Idaho Court of Appeals· 8/27/2004
State v. Waller
Citations
- 140 Idaho 764
- 101 P.3d 708
- 2004 Ida. App. LEXIS 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- lay witness testimony comparing signatures did not require scientific, technical, or specialized knowledge and is admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gutierrez, Lansing, Perry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-09-08· cited 270×
- State v. TapiaIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 59×
- State v. MissamoreIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-12-21· cited 27×
- State v. CaneloIdaho Court of Appeals· 1996-10-17· cited 27×
- State v. CustodioIdaho Court of Appeals· 2001-05-15· cited 23×
- State v. EnyeartIdaho Court of Appeals· 1993-03-15· cited 17×
- State v. SiegelIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-04-26· cited 13×
- State v. DragomanIdaho Court of Appeals· 1997-06-05· cited 9×
- State v. TurnerIdaho Court of Appeals· 2001-11-28· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.