State v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the reference to a lack of drug dependency in § 2 la-278 [b] operates as an affirmative defense to reduce the maximum sentence allowed by the statute”
• \the reference to a lack of drug dependency in § 21a-278[b] operates as an affirmative defense to reduce the maximum sentence allowed by the statute\
• “the reference to a lack of drug dependency in § 21a-278 [b] operates as an affirmative defense to reduce the maximum sentence allowed by the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ray
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-03-17· cited 34×
• State v. Robinson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-01-08· cited 13×
• State v. Moore
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-09· cited 8×
• State v. Brescia
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-07-20· cited 4×
• State v. Iassogna
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-06-06· cited 3×
• State v. Ray
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-01-06· cited 2×
• State v. Purvis
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-08-06· cited 2×
• State v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-09-20
• State v. Morales
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-03-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• State v. Hart
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-07· cited 56×
• State v. Ober
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-04-02· cited 26×
• State v. Green
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-01-20· cited 12×
• State v. Vaughn
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-12-19· cited 10×
• State v. Jenkins
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-06-11· cited 10×
• State v. Marrero
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-06· cited 9×
• State v. Morales
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-03· cited 9×