Skip to main content

State v. Walker

Citations

  • 48 Wash. 8
  • 92 P. 775
  • 1907 Wash. LEXIS 845

Syllabus

<p>Constitutional Law — Class Legislation — Police Power — Licenses' — Barbering. Laws 1901, p. 349, regulating the business of barbering and requiring a license therefor, is not unconstitutional as an abridgment of the liberty and natural rights of the citizen; since it is a proper health regulation within the police power.</p> <p>Same — Statutes—Invalidity of Part — Effect. The unreasonable provision restricting the granting of a license, for the practice of the trade of barbering, to apprentices of two years standing, does not render unconstitutional the whole act, Laws 1901, p. 349, regulating such trade and requiring a license therefor.</p> <p>Rudkin, J., dissenting.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring the defendant’s enrichment to be “at the 13 expense of another contrary to equity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mount, Rudkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.