State v. Wales
Citations
- 98 Kan. 790
- 160 P. 204
- 1916 Kan. LEXIS 194
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Embezzlement — Warehouseman — Wheat — Certain Evidence Erroneously Excluded. In the prosecution of a warehouseman for the alleged embezzlement of seven hundred and thirty-five bushels of wheat, it was error to reject evidence offered by the defendant touching his efforts to keep his mill a going concern, to obtain funds to meet his obligations, and a contract signed by the prosecuting witness tending to show a recognition of the defendant as a creditor instead of a bailee, and other evidence fairly going to the question of intent.</p>
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.