State v. Waldron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The defendant is correct that courts are obligated to adopt an interpretation that harmonizes related statutes while giving effect to each. However, the way to do that in the instant case is to give effect to subsections 775.087(2)(a)3. and (2)(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yasin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-25· cited 13×
• State v. Burkhart
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-31· cited 4×
• State v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-29· cited 4×
• Childs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-28· cited 1×
• State v. Robbins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-23
• Walter Bailey v. The State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-12-20

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-24· cited 20×
• State v. Drury
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-16· cited 7×
• Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-06· cited 7×
• Navarrete v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-17· cited 4×