State v. Wade
Citations
- 180 N.E.3d 722
- 2021 Ohio 4090
Syllabus
Appellant was not entitled to a hearing on his petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.21 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Because he submitted no evidence of what mitigating evidence existed that his counsel allegedly failed to present, he could not show that the failure to do so was prejudicial. The trial court's decision did not \summarily deny\ appellant's claims because it was sufficiently detailed to allow appellant review. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Mentel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. ColeOhio Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 797×
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-12-17· cited 791×
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 485×
- State v. KapperOhio Supreme Court· 1983-05-18· cited 335×
- State v. MilanovichOhio Supreme Court· 1975-04-02· cited 253×
- State v. ShortOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 187×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 140×
- State v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court· 1999-03-31· cited 127×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 2014-03-12· cited 91×
- State v. WadeOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-18· cited 15×
- State v. WadeOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-24· cited 4×
- State v. HoganOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.