Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/27/1994

State v. Waddell

Citations

255 Kan. 424
874 P.2d 651
1994 Kan. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“A conviction will be upheld if tangible coipus delicti evidence is proved outside that of the confession.”
When applying the formal corpus delicti rule, the State s burden is met if “there is some evidence which renders the corpus delicti more probable than it would be without die evidence.”
When applying the formal corpus delicti rule, the State's burden is met if 'there is some evidence which renders the corpus delicti more probable than it would be without the evidence.'
When applying the formal corpus delicti rule, the State's burden is met if 'there is some evidence which renders the corpus delicti more probable than it would be without the evidence.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.