State v. Waalen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the Criminal Jury Instructions Committee's conclusion that the meaning of \material\ is equivalent to the meaning of \substantial\ for purposes of Wis. Stat. § 939.22(42)
• rejecting the Criminal Jury Instructions Committee's conclusion that the meaning of \material\ is equivalent to the meaning of \substantial\ for purposes of Wis. Stat. § 939.22(42)
• \Requiring 'substantial impairment' of an individual's ability to operate a vehicle before that person could be found 'under the influence' would be inconsistent with the expressed legislative intent because it would not provide maximum safety for all users of state highways.\
• \Requiring `substantial impairment' of an individual's ability to operate a vehicle before that person could be found `under the influence' would be inconsistent with the expressed legislative intent because it would not provide maximum safety for all users of state highways.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).