· 7/14/2006
State v. Voss
Citations
- 36 Kan. App. 2d 127
- 137 P.3d 1077
- 2006 Kan. App. LEXIS 659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the district court’s dismissal of the action because in part, plaintiff presented “no new arguments beyond those already addressed by the magistrate judge”
- affirming the district court’s dismissal of the action because in part, plaintiff presented “no new arguments beyond those already addressed by the magistrate judge”
- affirming the district court’s dismissal of the action 2 because in part, plaintiff presented “no new arguments beyond those already addressed by the magistrate judge”
- affirming the district court’s dismissal of the action because in part, the plaintiff presented “no new arguments beyond those already addressed by the magistrate judge”
- “no new arguments beyond those already addressed by the magistrate judge were presented and this general objection is wholly insufficient to preserve the right to appeal”
- “no new arguments beyond those already addressed by the magistrate judge were presented and this general objection is wholly insufficient to preserve the right to appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Johnson, Pierron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.