Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 3/2/2004
State v. Volkman
Citations
- 675 N.W.2d 337
- 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 190
- 2004 WL 376994
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that officer’s observations suggesting motorist was under the influence of a controlled substance presented a particularized reason for expansion of the original stop and a basis for officer’s request to search motorist’s vehicle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klaphake, Randall, Crippen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-13· cited 183×
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-01-16· cited 107×
- State v. FortSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-05-01· cited 64×
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-16· cited 58×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-09-18· cited 33×
- State v. RodewaldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-11-08· cited 26×
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-12-31· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.