Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/30/2024
State v. V.J.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1668
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion finding that appellant failed to demonstrate that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering his cousin's statement prior to the expiration of the 120-day period provided in Crim.R. 33. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Mentel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. Hackett (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-17· cited 108×
- State v. McNealOhio Supreme Court· 2022-08-09· cited 66×
- Campbell v. American Foreign SS CorporationSecond Circuit· 1941-01-13· cited 65×
- United States v. Douglas TurnsSixth Circuit· 2000-01-05· cited 60×
- State v. CashinOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-28· cited 30×
- State v. LenoirOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15· cited 17×
- State v. LundyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-21· cited 14×
- State v. AngelOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-09· cited 11×
- State v. NoorOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-15· cited 10×
- State v. T.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-29· cited 10×
- State v. DodsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-07· cited 8×
- United States v. SimsSixth Circuit· 2003-06-24· cited 5×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-15· cited 5×
- State v. V.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-17· cited 4×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.