State v. Visinaiz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having been warned twice that noncompliance could result in dismissal, she maintained a stoic silence at her peril.”
• declining to treat with leniency pro se litigant who was an attorney
• affirm- ing a district court’s dismissal for “lack of prosecution” due to “noncompliance” with court orders
• affirm- ing a district court’s dismissal for “lack of prosecution” due to “noncompliance” with court orders
• “At the very least, Cintron could — and should — have notified the court both of her inability to comply and of the reasons for that noncompliance.”
• “A district court, as part of its inherent power to manage its own docket, may dismiss a case sua sponte for any of the reasons prescribed in [Rule] 41(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).