Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/18/2021
State v. Vinson
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 836
Syllabus
Because appellant failed to establish any of the exceptions under R.C. 2953.23(A)(1), the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction of appellant's successive petition for postconviction relief. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Sadler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. PooleOhio Supreme Court· 1973-03-14· cited 171×
- State v. DownsOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 126×
- State v. KaneOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-26· cited 42×
- State v. WaddyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-11· cited 40×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-11· cited 23×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-09· cited 18×
- Downs v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 13×
- State v. StewartOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 6×
- State v. VinsonOhio Supreme Court· 2009-11-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.