State v. Villar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it was apparent from context that the defendant was objecting to vindicate the defendant’s right to silence
• it was apparent from context that the defendant was objecting to vindicate the defendant’s right to silence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Swinney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-27· cited 6×
• State v. Coleman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-04· cited 1×
• State v. Shipps
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-10· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Smallwood
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-17· cited 54×
• State v. Avila-Nava
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-12-26· cited 28×
• State v. Ragland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-27· cited 9×
• State v. House
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-23· cited 9×
• Johnson v. Myrick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-10· cited 6×
• Williamson v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-03· cited 1×