State v. Villalobos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen an incomplete record is presented to an appellate court, it must assume that any testimony or evidence not included supported the action taken by the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cullison v. City of Peoria
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-09-15· cited 71×
• State v. Madsen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 46×
• Bliss v. Treece
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-07· cited 39×
• In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile No. J-86509
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-12-14· cited 33×
• State v. Miller
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 22×
• State v. Jones
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-11-09· cited 14×
• State v. Compton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-11-04· cited 2×
• State v. Meehan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-11-30· cited 2×
• State ex rel. Baumert v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. Dewayne Esaw
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-07-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State of Arizona v. Duguid
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1937-10-05· cited 36×
• Mario Balestreri v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1955-06-28· cited 35×
• State v. Wilson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-04-08· cited 19×
• Picow v. Baldwin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1954-06-30· cited 6×
• In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-74449A
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-07-10· cited 6×
• United States v. Salvador Vanegas, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 1954-10-30· cited 5×
• State v. Bennett
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1952-04-07· cited 4×