State v. Vierria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that remedy in this circumstance is to remand for resentencing to give the defendant the opportunity to argue for suspension of the fee or to make arguments concerning payment arrangements
• explaining that the appropriate remedy for imposition of probation-violation fee not announced in open court is to remand for resentencing in order to give the defendant the option to argue for waiver of the mandatory fee or to make arguments concerning payment options
• appropriate remedy for imposition of probation-violation fee not announced in open court is to remand for resentencing, giving the defendant the option to argue for waiver of the mandatory fee, or to make argu- ments concerning payment options
• appropriate remedy for imposition of probation- violation fee not announced in open court is to remand for resentencing, giving the defendant the option to argue for waiver of the mandatory fee, or to make arguments concern- ing payment options

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rion
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-05· cited 2×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-29· cited 2×
• State v. Peden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-08· cited 1×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-10-28
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Baccaro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-16· cited 18×
• State v. Hillman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-01· cited 10×
• State v. Pickerel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-30· cited 4×
• State v. Pacho
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-30· cited 4×
• State v. Postlethwait
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-18· cited 3×