Skip to main content

State v. Victor

Citations

  • 368 So. 2d 711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting its prior “holding that the ‘asportation’ could not be accomplished by means of the acts of a third person has uniformly received scholarly criticism as illogical and unduly technical”
  • noting its prior \holding that the 'asportation' could not be accomplished by means of the acts of a third person has uniformly received scholarly criticism as illogical and unduly technical\
  • \taking\ means an intent to usurp or negate the owner's dominion
  • \taking\ means an intent to usurp or negate the owner's dominion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.