Skip to main content
· 10/11/1978

State v. Verhagen

Citations

  • 272 N.W.2d 105
  • 86 Wis. 2d 262
  • 1978 Wisc. App. LEXIS 591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the burden of proving that the evidence was seized in an open field, in common with other exceptions to the warrant requirement, rests with the State”
  • wife who had recently left marital home had no authority to consent to warrantless search of home
  • where pursuant to order entered in connection with divorce proceedings, spouse’s legal right of access to home was for limited purposes only, she had insufficient search consent authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dean

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.