Skip to main content

State v. Verdugo

Citations

  • 180 Ariz. 180
  • 883 P.2d 417
  • 153 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16
  • 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the denial of a motion to suppress wiretap evidence based on post-hoc affidavits
  • upholding state authori- zation statute that court concluded “substantially complies” with federal wiretapping statute
  • upholding statute that permitted applications by “ ‘such prosecuting attorneys as [the attorney general or the county attorney] may designate in writing,’ ” and noting that applications had been supported by affidavit of the county attorney
  • person serving a sentence for a prior conviction “is entitled to credit only from the earliest release date for the previous offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Lacagnina, Livermore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.