State v. Veniegas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Board’s finding that a written request for authorization for outpatient treatment was not an informal claim for disability benefits
• noting informal claim provisions of section 3.157 do not apply where \there has not been a prior allowance or disallowance of a formal claim for compensation or pension\
• stating “[i]n the instant case, there has not been a prior allowance or disallowance of a formal claim for compensation or pension. Therefore, the veteran’s hospitalization report could not be accepted as an informal claim under 38 C.F.R. § 3.157.”
• stating “[i]n the instant case, there has not been a prior allowance or disallowance of a formal claim for compensation or pension. Therefore, the veteran’s hospitalization report could not be accepted as an informal claim under 38 C.F.R. § 3.157.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).