Supreme Court of New Jersey· 5/31/1990
State v. Velez
Citations
- 574 A.2d 445
- 119 N.J. 185
- 1990 N.J. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court did not abuse discretion in permitting State’s expert witness to testify despite failure to notify defendant about his testimony before trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-05-20· cited 164×
- State v. HeislerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-05-17· cited 77×
- State v. LozadaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-06-17· cited 25×
- State v. O'LOUGHLINNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-02-15· cited 9×
- State v. WolfeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-06-28· cited 7×
- State v. JamesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-07-26· cited 5×
- State v. G.B.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-04-09· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SainzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-06-18· cited 150×
- State v. KruseSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-11· cited 115×
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-06-14· cited 100×
- State v. ToroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-12-05· cited 23×
- State v. MerlinoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-03-16· cited 6×
- State v. MerlinoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-11-18· cited 5×
- State v. VelezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-12-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.