Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/13/2026
State v. Veal
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 488
Syllabus
The trial court abused its discretion by ordering appellant to pay restitution where the evidence did not establish that appellant's act of driving without a license was a direct and proximate cause of any economic loss. Judgment reversed in part and affirmed in part.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-22· cited 727×
- State v. YerkeyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-05· cited 42×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-23· cited 26×
- State v. OlsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-04· cited 15×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-07· cited 13×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-20· cited 12×
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-01· cited 9×
- State v. BorgerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.